United States v. Garcia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a mistrial and his subsequent motion for a new trial based on the prosecutor’s remarks during his opening statement. See United States v. Roy, 473 F.3d 1232, 1237 (D.C.Cir.2007); United States v. Alexander, 331 F.3d 116, 128-29…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gregory M. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Dykes, AntwainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Sammy L. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. ArthursCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009