Legal Opinion
Gildas v. Financial Pacific Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 9, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00851Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 WILLIAM GILDAS, Case No. 2:19-CV-851 JCM (VCF) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 FINANCIAL PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is defendant Financial Pacific Insurance Company’s 14 (“defendant”) motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, sever/bifurcate and stay plaintiff’s claims 15 for bad faith. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff William Gildas (“plaintiff”) filed a response (ECF No. 7), 16 to which defendant replied (ECF No. 9). 17 I. Background 18 The instant action arises from a dispute regarding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Marc Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Company Vicki WeedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- James Hirst v. Jean GertzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.