Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Matthews :
These proceedings, which were duly consolidated for hearing, are for the redetermination of deficiencies in income tax for 1928 asserted against the petitioners as follows: Whitman, Ward & Lee Co., $8,383.93; Arnold & Winsor Co., $960.50.
The issue presented is identical in each case, namely, whether the respondent erred in determining that the petitioner was taxable on the basis of a separate income tax return for the entire taxable year. Each petitioner is contending that it was a subsidiary of the General Foods Co. for a part of the year 1928, that its income for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Albert Leon & Son, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Fontana Union Water Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- Imperial Assurance Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
- Apartment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith Paper Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934