Legal Opinion

Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 5, 1934No. Docket Nos. 61552, 61553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Matthews :

These proceedings, which were duly consolidated for hearing, are for the redetermination of deficiencies in income tax for 1928 asserted against the petitioners as follows: Whitman, Ward & Lee Co., $8,383.93; Arnold & Winsor Co., $960.50.

The issue presented is identical in each case, namely, whether the respondent erred in determining that the petitioner was taxable on the basis of a separate income tax return for the entire taxable year. Each petitioner is contending that it was a subsidiary of the General Foods Co. for a part of the year 1928, that its income for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Albert Leon & Son, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Fontana Union Water Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  4. Imperial Assurance Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  5. Apartment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith Paper Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API