Legal Opinion

Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 5, 1934No. Docket Nos. 61552, 61553Published

1Opinion of the Court

WHITMAN, WARD & LEE COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

ARNOLD & WINSOR COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 61552, 61553.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 670; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1495;

January 5, 1934, Promulgated

Oscar McPeak, Esq., for the petitioners.

Bernard D. Hathcock, Esq., for the respondent.

MATTHEWS

OPINION.

MATTHEWS: These proceedings, which were duly consolidated for hearing, are for the redetermination of deficiencies in income tax for 1928 asserted against the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Albert Leon & Son, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Fontana Union Water Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  4. Imperial Assurance Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  5. Apartment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API