Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Handley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 18, 1986No. 85-122Published
1Opinion of the Court
494 So.2d 24 (1986)
Ex parte Dorothy HANDLEY.
(In re Dorothy HANDLEY v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, et al.)
85-122.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
July 18, 1986.
Richard A. Meelheim and James M. Fullan, Jr. of Beddow, Fullan & Vowell, Birmingham, for petitioner.
William M. Pate, Jr., Birmingham, for respondents.
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
TORBERT, Chief Justice.
Handley petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate its order granting a new trial.[1] The writ was denied without opinion on November 14, 1985. Handley's application for rehearing is granted.
Handley sued the City of Birmingham…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Aalco Wrecking Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Foster v. Greer and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.