Legal Opinion
State v. MacKey
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 1, 1971No. 2 CA-CR 251PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
We are asked on this appeal to decide only one question, whether A.R.S. §§ 13— 685 and 13-686 when taken together admit of such a double meaning as to be unconstitutionally broad, vague, uncertain and contradictory and thus violate due process standards under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Appellant, John P. Mackey, on 22 May 1967 was appointed guardian of the Estate of Reverend John P. DeVane, a Catholic Priest. Reverend DeVane later died. Fourteen days thereafter Mackey was notified by the deceased’s executor to set forth an accounting…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Collins v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. EdgarArizona Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.