Legal Opinion

Carville v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 18, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

The question before us is whether the petitioner is entitled to have a trial by jury upon his petition, brought under the St. 1895, c. 488, § 14, as amended by the St. 1901, c. 498, to recover damages for property taken by the metropolitan water board for the Wachusett reservoir. The petition was referred to commissioners, who made a report that the petitioner was not entitled to damages. This report was afterwards accepted' by a justice of this court. If the findings of the commissioners are correct, there are several grounds, either of which would preclude the petitioner from recovery. Some…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Fairbanks v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Wyman v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fitzmaurice v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API