Legal Opinion

Barrister Equip. Assocs. Series 115 v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 9, 1994No. Docket No. 23263-89UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARRISTER EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATES SERIES #115, BARRISTER ASSOCIATES, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Barrister Equip. Assocs. Series 115 v. Commissioner

Docket No. 23263-89

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-205; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 205; 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 2932;

May 9, 1994, Filed

For petitioner: Nathan M. Silverstein and Kurt F. Zimmerman.

For respondent: Andrew M. Winkler and D. Lyndell Pickett

FAY, PATE

FAY

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FAY, Judge: This case was assigned to and heard by Special Trial Judge Joan Seitz Pate pursuant to section…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API