Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Stutchman
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1989No. 18944PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
On October 29, 1979, Elizabeth A. Lynn entered into an agreement with respondents Thomas R. Stutchman and Fallon Convalescent Center, Inc. (“FCC”) whereby Stutchman, individually and on behalf of FCC, assigned to Lynn certain debts allegedly owed to them. In return, Lynn promised, inter alia, not to enforce any judgment that might be entered against Stutchman in a pending action.1 Lynn died testate on April 4, 1984. Thereafter, the King County Superior Court, State of Washington, entered an order admitting Lynn’s Last Will and Testament to probate, appointing appellant Gerald H.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaughan v. NorthupSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Brown v. Music IncorporatedAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Lefebure v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Canfield v. ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tractortechnic Gebrueder Kulenkempft & Co. v. BousmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re HashimUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Lake At Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991