Federal Insurance v. MBL, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
After soil and groundwater contamination in the City of Modesto was traced back to a drycleaning facility known as Halford’s Cleaner’s (Halford’s), the federal government brought a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA; 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.) action against the owners of the property on which Halford’s was located, as well as the lessees who owned and/or operated the facility, to recover the costs of monitoring and remediating the contamination. The defendants in the Lyon action subsequently filed third party actions against,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Co. v. Central National Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Hall CA-NV v. Old RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- LA Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- LA Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.