Legal Opinion

Brittain v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1934No. 25066. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Roy Brittain, on November 7, 1930, while engaged in extrahazardous employment in the woods for Bloedell-Donovan Lumber Company, sustained an injury to his back. The department of labor and industries recognized his claim, and paid compensation for time loss of thirty-four days, following which Ms claim was closed about December 10, 1930, without any other or further allowance.

Thereafter, April 2,1932, while engaged in the same kind of employment for the same employer, he received another injury of the same kind and in the same way. The department of labor and industries recognized his second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bradbury v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. De Victoria v. H & K CONTRACTORSHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jacobson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Matson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carlson v. F. H. DeAtley & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API