Legal Opinion

Carlson v. F. H. DeAtley & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1935No. 6196PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

June 18, 1932, appellant suffered a eoncededly compensable hernia for which he received compensation from July 7, 1932, to September 25, 1932, and medical, surgical attendance and hospital service from the State Insurance Fund, paid without any hearing or order by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Thereafter, February 14, 1933, appellant applied for a hearing contending that he was totally disabled by reason in substance of defects in the operation. The Fund resisted the claim for compensation on the ground that if appellant was suffering any disability it was the result of other causes and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Strong v. Sonken-Galamba Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Strouse v. Hercules Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Reinoehl v. Hamacher Pole & Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hawkins v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stroscheim v. ShayIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jensen v. Bohemian Breweries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Witt's Dairy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Arbogast v. Jerome Cooperative CreameryIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API