Matter of Compensation of Welch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which reversed the referee and held that claim - ant was not permanently and totally disabled. We reverse.
In this case, in which claimant does not exhibit total physical incapacity, we are involved with the so-called “odd-lot” doctrine, under which a disabled person may remain capable of performing work of some kind but still be permanently disabled due to a combination of medical and non-medical disabilities which effectively foreclose him from gainful employment. Such nonmedical considerations include age, education, adaptability…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gettman v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Livesay v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Smith v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Bruce v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Hurlburt v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Topolic v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.