Legal Opinion

New York Biscuit Co. v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 17, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The question in this case is whether the debts due to the plaintiff in connection with its business at Cambridge from various persons, firms, and corporations are taxable there as goods, wares, merchandise, and other stock in trade, under Pub. Sts. c. 11, § 20, cl. 1. Debts due to a person are certainly not goods, wares, or merchandise. The latter words occur in the statute of frauds, (Pub. Sts', c. 78, § 5,) and though it is held in this State that shares in corporations are goods, wares, and merchandise within the meaning of that statute, it is said that “ the words of the statute have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Hittinger v. Inhabitants of WestfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Boston Investment Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. New England & Savannah Steamship Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Story v. ChristinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Collector of Taxes v. Cigarette Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API