Hittinger v. Inhabitants of Westford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtColburn, J.
The essential facts in each of these cases being similar, and the legal questions raised the same, we have considered them together. The leading facts are, that Thomas S. Hittinger was an inhabitant of Belmont, where he voted and paid taxes upon his poll and all his personal property. His business was that of cutting, storing, and selling ice at wholesale, chiefly in large quantities, for export, or for use in this or other States. He sold only such ice as he cut and stored himself. He neither cut, stored nor sold ice at Belmont. He owned large ice-houses, near railroads, on the shores of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byers v. Franklin Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- City of Charlestown v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Loud v. City of CharlestownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Gray v. KettellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Barron v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Assessors of Springfield v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Ingram v. CowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.