State Ex Rel. Mayers v. Gray
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The relator, as Section 1295-31, General Code, (110 Ohio Laws, p. 22), provides, had been furnished with a copy of the complaint, had been given a hearing, and was entitled to state his case before the state board of optometry. He did not question the validity and authenticity of the affidavit either as to signature of the affidavit, as to attestation, or as to any other point. He declined to be sworn and to testify, to make any statement whatever, or to offer any other testimony in his behalf.
Section 1295-31, General Code, (110 Ohio Laws, 22), reads as follows:
“The board shall refuse to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- People of the Territory v. HasbrouckUtah Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Ohio State Medical Board v. ZwickOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Pierstorff v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Clayton v. Ohio Bd. of Nursing (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.