Legal Opinion

Butler v. Arnold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1921No. 16238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Beals, judge pro tempore, entered September 22,1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to set aside a conveyance, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for the purpose of setting aside a conveyance of real property made by one Samuel Arnold to the defendant, which it is claimed was fraudulent as to the plaintiff’s rights as a creditor of the grantor. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and it resulted *205in a judgment holding, that the deed was void in so far as it purported to convey the absolute title to the defendant, and that .the defendant held the title of the property as trustee to secure the payment to her of a certain sum of money and interest thereon. From this judgment, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. UddWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fisher v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Chapman v. CritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bond v. WerleyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. EganWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tomlinson v. BurgessWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API