Legal Opinion

Jane Doe, on behalf of her minor child, Sarah Doe v. Webster Central School District, Brian Neenan, Margaret Callahan, M.D., and Chris Callahan

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 31, 2025No. 6:25-cv-06599Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________________ JANE DOE, on behalf of her minor child, SARAH DOE, Plaintiffs, DECISION AND ORDER v. 6:25-CV-06599 EAW WEBSTER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, BRIAN NEENAN, MARGARET CALLAHAN, M.D., and CHRIS CALLAHAN, Defendants. ____________________________________ INTRODUCTION This case involves claims that a minor child has been excluded from the sixth grade because she is disabled—because she cannot receive the necessary Tdap vaccine due to existing medical conditions. Her mother is the plaintiff who has brought the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Matricia Moore v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. And John MorrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Faiveley Transport Malmo AB v. Wabtec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API