Legal Opinion
State v. McMillan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 4, 2005No. F04114, F04420 A112613 (Control), A112614PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals judgments of conviction in two criminal cases, which are consolidated for appeal. In the first case, defendant was convicted of theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055, forgery in the first degree, ORS 165.013, and forgery in the second degree, ORS 165.007. In the second case, defendant was convicted of racketeering, ORS 166.720, and theft in the first degree. The forgery charges in the first case formed predicate offenses for the racketeering charge in the second. All of the charges arose out of defendant’s participation with his wife in a livestock operation that involved,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Robert U. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. WootenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. TravaliniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.