Clarkson v. Ruiz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
This is the second appeal of this case. Our opinion on the first appeal is to be found in 108 S.W.2d 281, 286. It would serve no useful purpose to here reiterate all of the facts stated in that opinion, but it will be sufficient to refer to and adopt that opinion as a part of this opinion, insofar as it is applicable on this appeal.
In our former opinion we affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of the trial court, with the following statement: “As to said excepted appellees [Geo. B. Parr, Thelma D. Parr and Humble Oil & Refining Company] the judgment will be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Emery v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. HaydenTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Kearse v. KearseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Holland v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Realty Portfolio, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Peterson v. Black, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Bennett v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- MacDonald v. FollettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Carrier v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.