Legal Opinion

In Re Berger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1991PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Vivian Berger, appointed to represent a capital defendant in proceedings before this Court pursuant to this Court’s Rule 39.7, * has filed a motion requesting compensation for such services well in excess of the statutory maximum of $2,500 permitted under present practice by the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 (CJA), 18 U. S. C. § 3006A(d)(2). Although it has been the practice of this Court to adhere to the limits of §3006A(d)(2), petitioner argues that this statutory cap for capital cases recently has been lifted by a provision of the Anti-Drug Abuse Amendments Act of 1988, 102 Stat.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas Winford Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Steven Douglas Hill Mark S. Cambiano v. A.L. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Juan GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Terry Lynn NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gordon v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API