Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Thorn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1855PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The Chancellor having been of counsel for one of the parties, the cause was beard on the pleadings and proofs before the Hon. Henry W. Green, and pursuant to his advice and opinion a decree was entered dismissing the complainant’s bill, without costs.. From that decree the complainant appeals to this court. The material issues made by the pleadings sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, C. J.

The bill in this cause is filed by the administrator of Elizabeth Hait to recover a distributive share of the residue of the personal estate of William Jauncey, deceased, to which it is alleged that the said Elizabeth Hait became entitled as one of the next of kin of the said William Jauncey.

The right and interest of Elizabeth Hait, the complainant’s intestate, in the estate real and personal of which William Jauncey may have died intestate, was assigned by her to Herman Thorn, one of the defendants, by deed of assignment hearing date on the 27th of March, 1833. That assignment the bill seeks…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hay v. SalisburySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RowlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Federal Trust Co. v. OstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Union Cemetery Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Stonehurst at Freehold v. TP. COMM, TP. FREEHOLDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API