Legal Opinion

State v. Chippendale

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-812PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case presents the question of whether the state may charge and try a defendant for both involuntary manslaughter under a general provision, and aggravated vehicular homicide under a special provision. We answer this question in the affirmative, as the manifest legislative intent is that the two statutes be enforced coextensively. We therefore reinstate the decision and sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County.

I

It is a well-established principle of statutory construction that specific statutory provisions prevail over conflicting general statutes. Volpe, supra, at 193, 527…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. City of Newark v. VaziraniOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. RushOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SufronkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. ConyersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bellian v. Bicron Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API