Miller v. Bourdage
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs sued defendant in two counts: (1) conversion by defendant of a 1966 Ford vehicle for which plaintiff paid $3,400.00 and (2) unjust enrichment of defendant. Judgment was granted plaintiffs and defendant appeals. We affirm.
The trial court found:
2. On or about April 4,1979, Plaintiffs purchased from Defendant a 1966 Ford vehicle by executing a written contract approved by both parties.
3. The purchase price of $3,400.00 was paid in full upon execution of the contract.
4. On or about April 12, 1979, the Plaintiffs entered into a verbal agreement with Defendant to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Baugh v. DarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Blood v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Breeden v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Johansen v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ranville v. JTS Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gould v. WyseDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025