Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
After unsuccessfully litigating written motions both to suppress evidence and dismiss the indictments for failure to provide a speedy trial, appellant entered pleas of guilty to the offenses of possession of her*228oin1 and burglary of a habitation in a single proceeding. The admissible evidence incriminating appellant offered by the State on the main charges was his written judicial confessions and an exhibit with attachments.2
The records reflect there was the plea bargaining agreement between appellant and the State that the former would plead guilty and the State would…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Comer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Comer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.