Legal Opinion

Lumpkins v. Beneficial Finance Co. (In Re Lumpkins)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided May 14, 1981No. Bankruptcy No. 8000861, Adv. No. 810017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION GRANTING DEBTORS’ COMPLAINT TO AVOID SECURITY INTEREST

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtors seek to avoid Beneficial Finance Co.’s non-possessory, nonpurchase-money security interest in their household goods under Bankruptcy Code § 522(f). 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). Beneficial objects, maintaining that § 522(f) was not intended to apply retroactively, but that even if it were, it would be violative of due process under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The facts are undisputed. On January 26, 1979, the Debtors borrowed $4,796.02 from Beneficial, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Head v. Home Credit Co. (In Re Head)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  2. Pillow v. Avco Financial Services (In Re Pillow)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1981
  3. In Re ChandlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Teske v. General Finance Corp. (In Re Teske)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Security Pacific Finance Corp. v. Barto (In Re Barto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eagan v. Household Finance Corp. (In Re Eagan)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  2. Danella v. Kenney Builder Products Co. (In Re Danella)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  3. Taylor v. King (In Re King)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Gonser v. C. I. T. Financial Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API