Legal Opinion

Sherlock v. First National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Action by the appellee against the appellants and others, upon a promissory note.

The appellants pleaded, severally, non est factum, under *74oath. On the trial of the issue by a jury, there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The appellants make points in relation to the evidence, but the evidence cannot be regarded as in the record. Sixty days were given in which to file a bill of exceptions, and a bill was filed setting out evidence; but the time at which the bill was filed does not appear, nor does it in any way appear that it was filed within the time limited. The bill of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Ricketts v. DorrelIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Dunn v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API