Legal Opinion

Moody v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Patrol Officer McCole (Appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying Appellant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment NOV) or for new trial and granting the petition of Thomas Moody (Appellee) for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Section 1988).

The trial court summarized the facts as follows:

Officer McCole was employed by defendant PHA [Philadelphia Housing Authority] at the time of his encounter with plaintiff Thomas Moody.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Keenan v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Com., Dept. of Gen. Serv. v. Min. Prod.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Consolidated Return ex rel. McKean County Tax Claim Bureau of 9/12/2000Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Tristani v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API