Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Mass. v. United N. S.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1942No. 9042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This garnishment suit or proceeding is ancillary to Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Edgar B. Davis, 160 S.W.2d 543 this day decided by this court, and wherein a full statement of the nature and result of the litigation is made. Suffice it to say here that in this ancillary garnishment suit or proceeding the trial court quashed the garnishment upon the motion and plea of garnishee and intervening defendant, Edgar B. Davis, because of alleged defects in the affidavit and garnishment bond; and this appeal is by appellant Commonwealth alone from the judgment quashing the garnishment.

The first…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Floydada Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Buerger v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Zinn v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Commonwealth of Mass. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Wooters v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lenhard v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API