Legal Opinion · Dissent

Springer v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 1981No. A7909-04459, CA 17275Published

1DissentButtler, J.

Because I am unable to perceive any rational basis for the legislature’s permitting one convicted of criminal mischief in the first degree to expunge his record, but denying the right of expunction to one who is merely arrested, but not formally charged (and thus not convicted), for the same offense, I would affirm the trial court’s order directing the expunction of plaintiff’s arrest record. Unless ORS 137.225 is so construed, it suffers from constitutional infirmity by denying to plaintiff the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API