Joseph v. Horodesky
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Starke Circuit Court; Francis J. Vurpillat, Judge. Action between Jacob Joseph and another, and Juda Horodesky and others. Prom the judgment rendered Jacob Joseph and another appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.
Under Rule 22 of the Supreme and Appellate Courts, the briefs in this case present no question to this court for determination. Appellants’ brief contains no statement whatever of the errors assigned or relied on for reversal, no statement of the record showing any error or exception relied on, and no statement of the issues or decision. It contains merely what is called a statement of facts consisting of counsel’s deductions from the evidence, followed by quotations from certain *2authorities ou abstract questions of law,- but which are not applied, to any specific action of the court. There…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gary & Interurban Railway Co. v. HackerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Johnson v. BeboutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Roark v. VoshellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. BlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915