Queen v. Queen
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Litz, President:
This appeal, on behalf of the wife, involves the sufficiency of an allowance of alimony.
Plaintiff was granted a divorce a mensa et thoro from defendant and two dollars a week alimony. She contends that the allowance is insufficient.
The parties were married March 2,1931, and lived together, a year or more, as man and wife. In April, 1933, defendant went to Reno, Nevada, for the purpose of obtaining a divorce, but before he had acquired the necessary residence in Nevada, she instituted this suit. He has four children by a former marriage, two of whom, aged nine years and seven…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Stout v. Philippi Manufacturing & Mercantile Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Steenrod's Adm'r v. W. P. & B. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Cresap v. CresapWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Tiernan's Adm'r v. Minghini's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Clifton v. School District No. 14 of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Jones v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Tressler v. TresslerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937