Riverdale Mills Corp. v. American Modern Home Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
In this action to recover on a flood insurance claim, the defendant, American Modem Home Insurance Company (“American”), has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17) based on six separate grounds for relief. The Plaintiffs oppose the motion,
I. Background
Plaintiff, James M. Knott, is the owner of the corporate plaintiff, Riverdale Mills Corporation (“Riverdale”), a manufacturing plant/mill that produces wire mesh and electricity. Knott and Riverdale will be collectively referred to as “the Plaintiffs.” In front of the building occupied by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- John P. Coyne v. Taber Partners I, D/B/A Ambassador Plaza Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Gowland v. AetnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Aponte-Matos v. Toledo-DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Irene Flick v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jamal v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
- Tucard, LLC v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Richard Pecarovich v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Richard Pecarovich v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.