Legal Opinion

Stromberg v. Seaton Ranch Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1972No. 12226PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the district court of the eighth judicial district, County of Cascade, Hon. Paul G. Hatfield presiding without a jury. Judgment was entered upon findings of fact and conclusions of law which found the plaintiff, Matt Brown, was the efficient procuring cause of the sale of the Seaton ranch to the Glacier Colony of Hutterites, for $810,000 and entitled to a real estate commission in the amount of $40,500, together with attorney fees in the amount of $3,783.56, plus costs.

Plaintiff E. C. Stromberg, a real estate broker, filed an action, against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grace Realty Co. v. Peytavin Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. LevertonNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Shober v. BlackfordMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Flinders v. GilbertMontana Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Audit Services, Inc. v. Marselius Rolfson D/B/A Rolfson Company and Marcus Rolfson D/B/A Rolfson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. E.C.A Environmental Management Services, Inc. v. ToenyesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gilmore v. GilmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Flemmer v. MingMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Compton v. AlcornMontana Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API