Legal Opinion
Eanes v. McKnight
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1971No. Nos. 8413, 8414PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANDRY, Judge.
All parties to these consolidated actions have appealed judgments which: (1) award plaintiffs, Luther S. Fortenberry and Joy L. Fortenberry (Vendor), damages for alleged breach by defendants, Victor McKnight and Wanda S. McKnight (Purchaser), of a contract to buy and sell a residence; (2) granting plaintiff, Jane Elizabeth Eanes, a real estate broker (Broker), a commission allegedly due by Purchaser, and (3) denying the reconven-tional demand of Mrs. McKnight for damages for pain and anguish allegedly resulting from these reputedly unfounded actions. We reverse the judgments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fitzmorris v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Stack v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Womack v. SternbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Bonhagen v. HooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bornemann v. RichardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amend v. McCabeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Eanes v. McKnightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- High Plains Fuel v. Carto Intern. TradingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Dorsett v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lockhart v. SuttonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.