Legal Opinion

Eanes v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 6, 1972No. 51788PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice:

Exercising our supervisory jurisdiction, we directed Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for review of its judgment in these consolidated cases which affirmed in part, amended in part, reversed in part the judgment of the trial court and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in the Court of Appeal’s decision. Art. VII, Sec. 11, La.Const, of 1921; 251 So.2d 491; 259 La. 894, 253 So. 2d 220.

The Court of Appeal correctly stated that: “On July 27, 1968, Mr. Fortenberry listed for sale with Mrs. Eanes Lot…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Stan A. Plauche Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. Morere v. Dixon Real Estate Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Brown v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Probst v. Di GiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. Kuhn v. Stan A. Plauche Real Estate Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Amend v. McCabeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Naylor v. La. Dept. of Public HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Austrum v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Salmon v. HodgesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API