Legal Opinion

Wilkerson Shoe Co. v. Underwriters Insurance

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1975No. 72-C-226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This is an action on an insurance policy. The Plaintiff operated a shoe store in Frougs Department Store situated in a separate building in the Northland Shopping Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Plaintiff obtained from the Defendant a policy of insurance protecting its store against loss or damage from windstorm or lightning.1 At about 2:00 a. *1052m. on September 6, 1971 approximately one-half of the roof collapsed doing considerable damage to merchandise and furniture and equipment of the Plaintiff.2 No one was in the building at the time and apparently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ted T. Lynch and Ted H. Lynch v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Robert L. Kemp and Fred E. Cooper, Inc. v. American Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. American National Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement, No. 11152 v. Aetna Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. National Hills Shopping Center, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  5. Beattie Bonded Warehouse Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fajardo Shopping Center, S.E. v. Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API