Campbell v. Quigley
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The plaintiff is engaged in the taxicab business and has failed to comply with the provisions of an ordinance of the city of Rochester requiring him to file a bond in the sum of $500 “ conditioned for the prompt payment to the city of all sums which shall be or become due or owing to the city of Rochester from the licensee, arising directly or indirectly from the conduct of the business for which a license is held, and for the performance by the licensee of all obligations imposed by or arising under the laws of the State of New York or the ordinances of the common council of the city of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Browne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- City of Rochester v. MacAuley-fien Milling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Yellow Taxicab Co. v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- New York State Railways v. Monroe Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1929