Alicia Lutsuk v. Central Intelligence Agency

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALICIA LUTSUK, Case No. 2:25-cv-03081-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Alicia Lutsuk is representing herself in this action and seeks leave to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

(ECF No. 2.) For the 19 reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, and the 20 Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. 21 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA…