Legal Opinion

Wingilia v. Ashman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, entered into a written agreement with defendant to repair his dwelling house. Under the terms of the contract plaintiff was to receive $800 upon completion of the foundation, and the further sum of $1,000* upon the completion of the roof. The balance, $1,384, was to be paid when the work was completed. When the foundation was in and the roof completed plaintiff received only a part of his money, and defendant made promises of payment of the balance, but did not make good. Plaintiff, therefore, abandoned the work, and brought this suit to recover his damages…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnard v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Burman v. EwaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Strom-Johnson Construction Co. v. Riverview Furniture StoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Walker v. SymsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Town v. JepsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brasseaux v. GirouardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Goodson & Koski v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pierson v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Auseon v. READING BRASS COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. In the Matter of Wiltse Brothers Corporation, Bankrupt. Barton-Malow Company v. William H. Dempster, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API