Maddox b. Bullard
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.
Crystal L. Maddox seeks a writ of cer-tiorari to quash an order compelling her to submit to a psychological examination based on her claim for damages for mental anguish after Robert J. Bullard’s dog bit her. She contends that the trial court’s order departs from the essential requirements of the law in requiring a psychological examination under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.360. We grant the petition for certiorari in part, and quash the order to the extent that it fails to comply with rule 1.360(a)(1)(B).
Rule 1.360(a) provides that an examination is authorized when the examined party’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Wade v. WadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barry v. BarryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Manubens v. ManubensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Espinosa v. D.H. Griffin Construction Company, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Oldham v. GreeneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Jordan v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.