Legal Opinion

Napier v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1952PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The plaintiff, Mrs. ITillery Napier, instituted suit for the loss of services and consortium of her husband as a result of an alleged accident suffered by him while he was in the employ of the defendants.

At the time of the accident, the husband was subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act and defendants have been and still are paying plaintiff’s husband benefits under the Act. This suit sought damages at common law for the loss of services and consortium. The defendants demurred and this demurrer was sustained.

It is conceded that the question presented is one of first impression in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Dunn Const. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hull v. Hull Bros. Lbr. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Underwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Hunley v. Silver Furniture Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API