Legal Opinion
Sturgis v. Honold
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 15, 1856PublishedCited by 37 opinions
This, like the preceding case, of which it constituted a branch, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. It was similar in all respects to the preceding case, except that Honold purchased five-sixteenths of the ship from Sturgis, and four-sixteenths from Bulkley. The two cases'proceeded through the courts pari passu, and were argued together in this court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Curtis
This case depends on the same facts and principles as the preceding case, and the judgment of the Circuit Court therein is affirmed.
2Cited by37 opinions
- Peterson v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Cordova & Simonpietri Insurance Agency Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Melquiades T. Lagandaon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Klimko v. Virginia Employment CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.