Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund v. City of Austin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentPowers, Justice
I respectfully dissent. Under the rules that govern cases like the present, we are obliged to assess the costs of the appeal against appellants, not the City of Austin.
When, as here, the trial court denies a plaintiffs application for temporary injunction restraining the construction of an improvement, and the defendant erects the improvement pending appeal, the temporary-injunction cause becomes moot and must be dismissed at the plaintiffs cost. Zuniga v. U.S. Investors, Inc., 453 S.W.2d 811, 811-12 (Tex.1970); Cameron v. Saathojf, 162 Tex. 124, 345 S.W.2d 281, 282 (1961). The same holds…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landon v. Jean-Paul Budinger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Guajardo v. Alamo Lumber CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- International Ass'n of MacHinists Union No. 1486 v. Federated Ass'n of Accessory WorkersTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Keene Corp. v. Gardner, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Hulett v. West Lamar Rural High School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.