Legal Opinion

Wright v. Dick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1889No. 13,513PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The plaintiffs, Dick and Taylor, claiming to be the joint owners of an undivided two-thirds of a particularly described eighty-acre tract of land in Huntington county, and alleging that the defendant, Marshall Wright, was the owner and in possession of the other undivided one-third of the same tract, commenced suit for partition, and to correct an alleged clerical mistake in their deed. The defendant presented various defences by way of answer to the complaint, and he also filed a cross-complaint, in which he claimed title to the entire tract of land. After setting out the facts in detail…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ayres v. DupreyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Chamblee v. TarboxTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Fletcher v. McGillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Cook v. Jenkins & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Branch v. FoustIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Willard v. BringolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Lurton v. RodgersIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Fox v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API