Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. McGill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1887No. 11,597PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was a suit by McGill against Fletcher & Churchman, to set aside a sale and conveyance of real estate made to the latter by the sheriff of Marion county, upon an execution against the property of the former.

Upon request, the court found the facts specially, and stated conclusions of law thereon. As there are no other questions except such as relate to the propriety of the conclusions of law stated by the court, reference to the pleadings is immaterial.

The material facts found by the court were, in substance, ■as follows:

On the 8th day of November, 1876, McGill was the owner in fee simple…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Byers v. SurgetSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Tiernan v. WilsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1822

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Donald Eugene Bundles, Debtor-Appellant. In Re Donald Eugene Bundles v. William J. Baker, Indiana National Bank and James C. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. BlickleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Branch v. FoustIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API