Legal Opinion
Farrah v. Monterey Transfer & Storage, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 23, 2008No. C 07-06044 JWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
JAMES WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Rhonda Farrah (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Monterey Transfer & Storage, Inc. (“Defendant”) for alleged violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 9.) The Court conducted a hearing on April 7, 2008. Based on the papers submitted to date and oral arguments of counsel, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice.
II. BACKGROUND
In a First Amended…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Scharringhausen v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009