Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunnagan v. Ndikom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2000No. COA99-1020Published

1Dissent

Judge Walker

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion holding the Commission erred in granting petitioner’s application. The appellants-intervenors are existing carriers seeking to prevent the petitioner from obtaining common carrier authority to transport Group 18-A household goods throughout the State.

The majority cites to the three requirements an applicant must prove to the satisfaction of the Commission pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-262(e). The only one of the three at issue here is the following:(1) That public convenience and necessity require the proposed service…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. EddlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Industrial Group for Fair Utility RatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Gas ServiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API