Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Hickie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1964No. 3839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to construe an holographic will.

In a trial to the court, it was held that real estate and bonds of the testatrix which were not specifically disposed of in her will had been devised and bequeathed to a bank in trust for local charities, and that the will disposed of her entire estate. The testatrix’ heirs at law have appealed.

Mrs. Frey, in July, 1958, at the age of 83, executed a will and, in October, 1958, a codicil thereto, as follows:

“I, Birdie Hartsough Frey, of the City of Stephenville, County of Erath, State of Texas, being of sound and disposing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanford v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Right of Way Oil Co. v. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. HanksTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kostroun v. PlsekTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carr v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Carr v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Western Auto Supply Co. v. Charles Bassett Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API