Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. Schweiker
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 7, 1982No. Civ. 82-1078PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAY McNICHOLS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s Motion to Tax Costs and Attorney’s Fees. Plaintiff timely filed this motion after prevailing in this court on her appeal to be provided Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, which were originally denied by the defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Plaintiff filed this motion pursuant to Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure (I.R.C.P.) 54 and 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Supp. IV 1980). Motions in United States District Court are governed by Federal Rules and statutes. U. S. for Acme Granite & Tile Co. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wolverton v. SchweikerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1982
- United States v. Rich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Haitian Refugee Center, an Unincorporated, Not for Profit Organization v. Edwin Meese, III , Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Hyatt v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Trujillo v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- United Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.